Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 15:36

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Disney to pay almost $439 million to take full control of streaming service Hulu - AP News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Apple’s Liquid Glass design is paving the way for AR glasses - TechCrunch
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Hailee Steinfeld Marries Bills QB Josh Allen - The Hollywood Reporter
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Police chief Grant Hardin caught after escaping Arkansas prison - BBC
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How can fashion design be used to make a political statement in popular culture, and society?